|
venus rocks Friday, March 31, 2006, 09:40 a.m. #1076 |
|
the lost sheep Tuesday, March 28, 2006, 01:02 p.m. #1075 |
|
the confession Tuesday, March 28, 2006, 11:01 a.m. #1074 |
|
the sanctuary Tuesday, March 28, 2006, 09:37 a.m. #1073 |
|
nobody should blog Sunday, March 26, 2006, 03:57 p.m. #1072 |
|
capote Sunday, March 26, 2006, 09:32 a.m. #1071 |
|
jarhead Saturday, March 25, 2006, 09:54 a.m. #1070 |
Masturbation. Re-reading of letters from unfaithful wives and girlfriends. Cleaning your rifle. Further masturbation. Re-wiring Walkman. Arguing about religion and meaning of life. Discussing in detail, every women the marine has ever fucked. Debating differences, such as Cupban VS Mexican, Harleys VS Hondas, left VS right-handed masturbation. Further cleaning of rifle. Studying the mail order bride catalogue. Further masturbation. Planning a marine's first meal on return home. Imagining what a marine's girlfriend and her man Joey are doing in the alley or in a hotel bed...But that does not mean the movie has no real "action" going on. The movie looks at the soldiers as real people instead of just moving props in a war, and there are in fact many poignant scenes, like the recruit who freaked out and was killed in the live fire range, the burning oil fields, the aftermath of a bomb attack... Here is an extract of an insightful (albeit long) review on imdb.com which tells you why you should watch this remarkable movie:
JARHEAD is the third in a string of successful films by Sam Mendes, first wowing audiences with AMERICAN BEAUTY and then continuing our admiration with ROAD TO PERDITION. With JARHEAD, Mendes solidifies himself as one of the most extraordinary filmmakers working today.
The first thing that may surprise audiences is that this is not necessarily an anti-war piece. Mendes and screenwriter William Broyles, Jr. have been careful not to make this film narrow in view. Instead, by focusing on the psychological turmoil of one soldier, Anthony Swofford (Jake Gyllenhaal), JARHEAD is able to speak specifically about this man's experience and how it relates to those around him.
Mendes drenches the screen with sights and sounds that literally envelope us in the horrors of warfare. These explosions of vision and noise are counterbalanced, however, with scenes of great sadness and warmth. One scene that comes quickly to mind is a boot camp drill where the young soldiers are crawling under barbed wire - the sound design is such that we hear every character screaming or grunting as the gunshots zoom overhead. But then, the scene changes. An event occurs that allows Mendes to silence all of the violence and machismo of war. Amongst the hysteria of the scene, one of the soldiers freaks out and a gunshot is discharged. Mendes lets the camera witness this as if it hadn't expected it to occur. The characters are in shock, and so is the audience. It's just one of many powerful moments where Mendes changes from loud, visceral warfare to quiet, poignant moments.
Not that there's much warfare here. In fact, the lack of warfare becomes a theme for this film. Peter Sarsgaard, in a great performance, reaches his breaking point during the final third of the film, and it's a riveting moment where the lack of warfare has finally made him explode. His performance is very strong throughout, but it is not until the second half of the film when he finally gets the chance to break loose. Don't mistake the first half of his performance as simply being on-screen... charisma that palpable doesn't happen by accident. It is because he uses his scenes and lines wisely in the first half that we end up so engrossed and fascinated by him in the second. A true supporting performance.
Jamie Foxx surprised me here, and not because I didn't think he was a fine actor. Obviously, he is. But his character is so well-conceived, and works wonderfully as the counterpoint to the Gyllenhaal character. Foxx plays his scenes confidently, but also with touches of gravitas that, even in RAY, we haven't seen before. The scene that we get a glimpse of at the end of the trailer is wonderful in its fullness, and helps Mendes' film give us a well-rounded opinion of Swofford's opinions on the war. Foxx is by turns hilarious and profound.
And then there was Jake Gyllenhaal. Wow. This is an incredible performance. Watch for a dozen scenes where he literally explodes off the screen, but how he also juggles the quieter moments with great aplomb. What makes Swofford an intriguing character is that he doesn't always get our sympathy; or, for that matter, want our sympathy. He is scarred by war and his family and the life he left behind, and he is just looking for a way to get out of the sand and the sexual dysfunction of war and the lack of gunfire. Gyllenhaal captivates our attention from his very first glimpse, and his voice-over performance laces the film with irony and melancholy. He is a great physical presence in the film as well. I could cite more than a few dynamic scenes that he performs masterfully in, but I'll just mention one. Swofford points a rifle at a fellow soldier after a failed night watch, and then turns the rifle on himself, asking the fellow soldier to discard a round into his mouth. It's an indescribably painful scene to watch, but it's also an example of Gyllenhaal's brave and honest portrayal of this bruised man.
Some people have begun to write about this film as lacking structure or story, and in saying that I'm afraid they may have missed the point. This is a story about ambiguity of self, about dislocation, about ambivalence to war and love, about sexual frustration. In these terms, I think Mendes & Co. have found the perfect way to cinematically allow us to experience the same sort of blank complexity that Swofford must have felt. And that's why I find this a remarkable adaptation of a memoir that I admire deeply.
I could go on and list scene after scene that make this a memorable film, but I'll let you experience it yourself and decide for yourself. In summation, JARHEAD is a viscerally unforgiving, psychologically heartbreaking masterpiece.
|
performance bonus Friday, March 24, 2006, 07:42 p.m. #1069 |
|
crop circles Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 08:44 p.m. #1068 |
|
the demon amongst us Monday, March 20, 2006, 08:56 p.m. #1067 |
|
the new term awaits Sunday, March 19, 2006, 08:36 p.m. #1066 |
|
area 51 Saturday, March 18, 2006, 10:44 p.m. #1065 |
![]() |
Watched Ding's ruanzu concert at NAFA Foundation Theatre (it was so-so), then took Bus 51 home at the end of it. First there was this man who was half-dressed. His shirt was unbuttoned, and he was baring his front and one shoulder (see picture). His long hair was in a mess and there were some unknown objects in it (I swear I saw something move in his hair). Every now and then, he would jerk in a quirky manner, very much like Sadako. Quite freaky really. Then there was this smell in the air. I couldn't tell where it came from (and I didn't want to say that it's from the weird guy since I had no proof) but the smell was extremely pungent - the kind of smell which DEMANDS your attention and the kind which you can't just hope that you'll get used to. It was like the Concentrate of the Concentrate of Urine (CCU), and it's ten times worse than the stench of a chao recruit. |
|
stone settlers Saturday, March 18, 2006, 01:16 a.m. #1064 |



|
munich Wednesday, March 15, 2006, 12:39 p.m. #1063 |
|
the grand plan Tuesday, March 14, 2006, 11:46 p.m. #1062 |




|
crash Sunday, March 12, 2006, 12:44 p.m. #1061 |
Several stories interweave during two days in Los Angeles involving a collection of inter-related characters: a black police detective with a drugged-out mother and a thieving younger brother, two car thieves who are constantly theorizing on society and race, a distracted district attorney and his angry pampered wife, a racist veteran cop who disgusts his more idealistic younger partner, a successful black Hollywood director and his wife who must deal with the racist cop, a Persian-immigrant father who buys a gun to protect his shop, a Hispanic locksmith and his young daughter who is afraid of bullets, and more. For two days in Los Angeles, a racially and economically diverse group of people pursue lives that collide with one another in unexpected ways. These interactions are always interesting, and sometimes quite unsettling. The film explores and challenges your ability to judge books by their covers.This should be a textbook movie for all schools (just censor the brief nudity) when discussing issues on racism.
|
ptc and bbq Saturday, March 11, 2006, 07:24 p.m. #1060 |








|
done Friday, March 10, 2006, 11:21 p.m. #1059 |
|
mean kids Thursday, March 9, 2006, 07:37 p.m. #1058 |
|
transamerica Monday, March 6, 2006, 07:23 p.m. #1057 |
|
much ado about nothing (music, actually) Monday, March 6, 2006, 03:31 p.m. #1056 |
CH: So, have you been upgrading yourself recently?It was a very harmless piece of conversation - I guess Mr Zhang wouldn't even remember it. But his questions woke me up in a way... If music is something which I love and want to carry on with, shouldn't I be improving myself, instead of merely staying in the comfort zone, contented with whatever musical background and technical skills I already have?
Me: Upgrading? What do you mean?
CH: Musically... like expanding your horizons in composing and your skills in instruments? Are you under any teacher right now?
Me: Hmm, no... No teachers... Just practising on my own, and still in BH...
CH: Then wouldn't you remain stagnant?
|
remembrances Sunday, March 5, 2006, 08:52 p.m. #1055 |
|
the unknown school Saturday, March 4, 2006, 08:55 p.m. #1054 |
|
the little gestures of kindness Saturday, March 4, 2006, 03:06 p.m. #1053 |
It's surprising sometimes how we learn from the least expected of sources.
In the army, I shared a bunk with this Indian friend S. Though we were bunk mates, I guess we didn't know each other that well. When I went out-of-course, as a part of the course was still on-going, they didn't move me out. So I continued staying with S for the next few weeks.
We no longer shared the same routines, as I went to help out in the store and gained the priviledge of staying up late with no lights-out time, as well as waking up late with a very late reveille time. So my store friends and I would do boliao things like take walks around camp, chit chat in the store, explore NTU even late in the night, and when I got back, S still wouldn't be back most of the time. (Training, being training, was beyond bad.)
During that time I rarely saw him at night in the bunk. He would come back when I was asleep, and he would leave the room when I was still sleeping.
One morning, I woke up while he was still in the room. He was groping about in the dark preparing to leave. I inferred he had been doing this all the time - not daring to use the lights or make much noise in case he woke me up each night and morning. And I was very touched, and guilty that I couldn't be more thankful.
I know how hard it is to settle the stuff he had to in the dark, without noise too! In the army, speed is a trade-off against noise. The fastest way to clear a rifle is to pull-pull-pull-shoutclear-look-slap-slap. Very noisy. The fastest way to let go of something is to just drop it from waist level to the ground. Very noisy - and good for the back too since you don't have to bend down. The fastest way to get dressed is to do it naturally. Not very noisy, but it really requires some effort if you remember that it includes putting on the webbing full of metal stuff attached to it like the bayonet, the fullpack with the straps and clips, and the boots which are heavy and make a sound each time they touch the tiles on the floor.
So to keep the volume to a minimum, S had to go about all this very slowly indeed. He might be cursing his luck why he had me for a roommate, but if he did, he never showed it.
So that morning he said bye, and left the room again.
This really left a deep impression on me. I mean, it's really the logical thing to do when you have a sleeping buddy in your room, but I guess many people don't do it.
So in the lab now, I always make a conscious effort to check if anyone is sleeping when I arrive each morning before switching on the lights. Today I forgot. And sure enough my friend was sleeping here.
Guilty... But he's a deep sleeper, so that's not too bad.
You must really believe too that I am typing this post in the dark. My typing skills are really not bad even though I don't touch-type... Haha...
|
the week of accidents Friday, March 3, 2006, 09:52 a.m. #1052 |
|
teaching students beyond their assumed ability Thursday, March 2, 2006, 03:38 p.m. #1051 |
My Environment Club is participating in the National Weather Study Project, and one of the participating teams is working on the topic "The Relationship between Temperature and the Number of Sleepy Students". The team did a survey for two weeks to find out the number of dozing classmates at various times of the day, and managed to get a lot of raw data. After that, I got the students to plot two curves - one of the temperature against time, and another of the number of sleeping students against time, hoping that the curves would have a similar shape and we could then establish an approximate conclusion that temperature and sleepiness are related.
To our horror, the shapes of the graphs looked radically different, and a general trend could not be established at all. Then I recalled that I learnt a statistical method during my university days - the Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient - and thought that we could use this to find a correlation amongst the seemingly unrelated variables. However, my major concern was that this was a method which I learnt in the university! Will secondary school students be able to understand the method if I attempt to teach them? Moreover my students are in the Normal Academic stream... Will they be able to appreciate the method and apply it?
After much deliberation and research, I simplified the statistical method into a sheet of summarised notes which stated the procedures of applying the method in point form. During one of the project discussion sessions, I spent an hour teaching two boys (who were in charge of the "analysis" part of the project) to use the method and plowing through the massive data laboriously with them. When I have guided them in the initial part and felt that they were confident enough to go on their own, I left the boys alone to work on the rest of the data. After much tedious and hard work, the boys managed to prove mathematically that temperature is indeed related to sleepiness!
Both the students and I were thrilled (I almost jumped in joy) when we finally managed to get a desirable result after the long process of learning and hard work. Initially I doubted whether the students would be interested to learn, or that they would not be able to understand, but I have clearly underestimated them. Not only have they shown much interest, they were able to absorb the new knowledge very quickly. Throughout the process, they were extremely enthusiastic and even volunteered to bring my notes home to study and get familiarized with the complicated formula.
From this experience, I learnt that we should never be too ready to assume that our students "cannot do it". For this instance, the Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient may be university-level mathematics, but the students have been able to make sense of it and apply it to do something meaningful in real life! That's more gratifying and rewarding for both teachers and students than learning the syllabus! When I first started teaching the students, they themselves doubted whether they could understand. However, I encouraged them and tried to convince them that the method was something useful which they could apply in their real life. We pushed on - both teacher and students. Gradually the students saw some relevance when they opened their minds, and they started to feel more excited when they tried out the method and it seemed to work...
Perseverance and confidence are indeed the keys to learning and teaching. And the fruits are wondrously worth the challenge. I will surely bear this in mind.