Considered Harmful

The ramblings and wanderings of yet another geek.

Late May (5/22/00 - 6/2/00)

-------

Early May (5/1/00 - 5/21/00)

-------

Late April (4/19/00 - 4/28/00)

-------

Early April (4/3/00 - 4/13/00)

-------

Late March (3/20/00 - 4/2/00)

-------

Early March (1/1/00 - 1/19/00)

-------

Late February (2/15/00 - 2/29/00)

-------

Early Fenruary (2/1/00 - 2/14/00)

-------

Late January

-------

First Steps (1/1/00 - 1/17/00)

-------

« 5 ? webloggers # 5 »

Pitas.com!

Archive Index
Current Entries
Riddler
Mail

Weblog Resources:

« webloggers »

considered harmful adj.
[very common] Edsger W. Dijkstra's note in the March 1968 "Communications of the ACM", "Goto Statement Considered Harmful", fired the first salvo in the structured programming wars (text at http://www.acm.org/classics). Amusingly, the ACM considered the resulting acrimony sufficiently harmful that it will (by policy) no longer print an article taking so assertive a position against a coding practice. (Years afterwards, a contrary view was uttered in a CACM letter called, inevitably, "`Goto considered harmful' considered harmful'"). In the ensuing decades, a large number of both serious papers and parodies have borne titles of the form "X considered Y". The structured-programming wars eventually blew over with the realization that both sides were wrong, but use of such titles has remained as a persistent minor in-joke (the `considered silly' found at various places in this lexicon is related).
-- from The Jargon File, version 4.1.4.

This page is the fault of Brennan M. O'Keefe. Deal with it.