TOTALITARIANISM TODAY


Monday, February 24, 2003

For those who are open to falling from grace.

Peter Elias' "Love Pets" makes a sprightly companion for Debbie Nathan's "Scenes from an anti-war bathroom". Joyce Carol Oates' "Softcore" slips through your mind as softly as a razor cuts through young skin. Finish with Helon Habila's "Another Age" to end up somewhere south of good governance or well-choreagraphed sex.


Monday, February 24, 2003

Another chicken and egg scenario.

Is alcohol responsible for the invention of sports? The gents at Modern Drunkard, unceasing in their dedication to Bacchus, certainly seem to think so.


Monday, February 24, 2003

A thump on the head to Rumsfeld and the wing-tipped, eager young lawyers who plead the Fifth as they down their third.

Michael Byers casts a skeptical eye on the laws of war as interpreted by the United States.

International humanitarian law, the jus in bello, concerns the way wars may be fought. It is distinct from the law governing when wars may be fought (the jus ad bellum of self-defence and the UN Charter). Also known as the 'laws of war', international humanitarian law traces its origins to 1859, when the Swiss businessman Henri Dunant witnessed the aftermath of the Battle of Solferino and initiated a movement that became the International Committee of the Red Cross. Today, the rules of international humanitarian law are found in the 1907 Hague Conventions, the 1949 Geneva Conventions and their two Additional Protocols of 1977, as well as in a parallel body of unwritten customary international law that binds all countries, including those that have not ratified the Conventions and Protocols. A central principle prohibits the direct targeting of civilians, as well as attacks on military targets that could be expected to cause civilian suffering disproportionate to the specific military goals to be acheived.

During the first Gulf War, these obligations were taken seriously. Desert Storm was the first major combat operation undertaken by the United States since the Vietnam War. Fearful of another domestic backlash if things went wrong, the politicians left the conduct of hostilities to professional soldiers - who are trained to fight by the book. Adherence to the rule of law was further aided by the 18-member coalition. Some US allies accord considerable importance to the requirements of international humanitarian law, and so, in order to maintain the coalition, the US had to fight according to the rules.

Some two hundred military lawyers were dispatched to the Gulf. They vetted every target: a strike on a statue of Saddam Hussein in Baghdad was ruled out because only targets that contributed to the Iraqi war effort were permissible under international humanitarian law. Those legal controversies that arose stemmed from differing interpretations of the law, rather than any desire to ignore legal constraints. For example, when the US used cluster bombs and fuel-air explosives to attack Iraqi armour, at least five British officers resigned their commissions having seen the effects these weapons had on Iraqi soldiers. A similar divergence of views arose over the use of earthmovers and tank-mounted ploughs to bury Iraqi soldiers alive in their trenches, thus avoiding the dangers of hand-to-hand combat. International humanitarian law forbids methods of warfare that cause 'unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury', but what do these terms actually mean? Wars are fought to be won; international humanitarian law merely balances military necessity against humanitarian concerns. Where one sets the balance depends on where one's coming from: the insular, individualistic, religious character of the US would seem to matter here.
Sadly enough, it seems that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is as "pragmatic" as a first-year law student in balancing the "common good" with common law. I confess that the number of not-yet-practicing attorneys who prefer to remain silent on the legal issues raised by the war on terrorism seems tragic to me. Alas, perhaps changes in corporate law or tax law shove the truly frightening aside-- it does seem idealistic to expect to be a civically-engaged corporate lawyer who has time to do more than hit the occasional, staggering "bar review".
There is no love lost between the Defense Secretary and his military lawyers. In October 2002, CIA operatives used a Predator drone to track the Taliban leader Mullah Omar to a building in a residential area of Kabul. An air strike was called off because a lawyer at US Central Command was concerned about the risk of disproportionate civilian casualties. According to a report in the New Yorker, the incident left Rumsfeld 'kicking a lot of glass and breaking doors'. The Secretary has subsequently taken steps to reduce the number of lawyers in uniform.

Rumsfeld has also been encouraging a re-evaluation of the prohibition on targeting civilians, particularly with regard to actions directed at shattering support for the opponent regime. This kind of thinking was popular during the Second World War - as evidenced by the firebombing of Dresden and Hamburg - but was subsequently rejected during the negotiation of the Geneva Conventions. Today, a theory which holds that a regime has 'five strategic rings' is attracting adherents in Washington. According to this view, each ring represents a different facet of a society: its political leadership, economic system, supporting infrastructure, population and military forces. Air power is supposed to enable the United States to target opponents from the 'inside out', to bypass military forces and go directly for the political leadership. In this context, the indirect targeting of civilians - through the destruction of bridges, electrical grids, oil refineries and water-filtration plants - is considered justified because it hastens the course of the conflict (while, incidentally, reducing the cost of victory).
If I sound disappointed in young American lawyers or law school students (who still call themselves lawyers-- blame it on the trickle-down effect of overly effusive self-congratulation), it is because I am. The criticism of law students used to be, "Oh, they are too idealistic, too concerned with changing the world for the better." Things have changed. If law students were idealistic, then I would already be in law school. Unfortunately, many law students are cyncial, jaded, "pragmatic" money-chasers who have little concern for integrity. Granted, I know quite a few exceptions to this rule-- and I admire such people all the more for their activism and committment given their time constraints.


Monday, February 24, 2003

Liberty, justice, and regime-change for all.

Putin and Chirac have confirmed that they stand together in their positions on how to deal with Iraq. Meanwhile, Kurdish leaders in Iraq warned yesterday that American-sanctioned deployment of Turkish troops in northern Iraq would lead to fighting. There can be no doubt as to the role anticipated by American officials for Turkish forces in Iraq.

Given that the American government has indicated to Iraqi oppostions groups that Iraq's reconstruction will involve an immediate 1-2 year administration by US military officials, the news that Iraqi oil resources will be state-controlled reeks of bad regime-change taste. Admittedly, watching National Guard members from Ohio kiss their families good-bye as they prepare to be deployed to the Gulf broke my heart. At least half of Ohio's National Guard deployments are women.


Monday, February 24, 2003

Your views requested...

In Ohio, visiting my step-family for the week, I just discovered that I am going to an Ohio State Univ. basketball game tommorow night. At this point, humble prostrations are in order, as I know nothing about basketball. This is a plea for help-- gentlemen (esp. Radley), any advice on which team will win or any tidbits of info that might make me less of an outsider at this game?


Monday, February 24, 2003

Glass ceilings at Wal-Mart?

As a sex discrimination suit against Wal-Mart unfolds, studies of Wal-Mart practices reveal a big gap in the status of male and female employees. How much of this is institutionalized and how much is particular to the working culture of Wal-Mart employees has yet to be determined. It's a coin toss as to whether this will be worth watching.


Monday, February 24, 2003

All the colors mixed together.

Killing the Buddha's awe-exciting recommended reading list of last year's best "heresies and revelations in print" deserves attention. For more a more frightening twist on the uses of heresy and heirarchy in these times, pick up a copy of the latest Harper's Magazine and read Jeffrey Sharlet's "Jesus Plus Nothing". Sharlet edits Killing the Buddha. In his piece for Harper's, Sharlet goes undercover to reveal the secrets of America's most powerful theocrats-- "The Family".


Sunday, February 23, 2003

Attack of the ambiguous "fantasy".

Terence P. Jeffrey's "Flight to Fantasy" proves disturbing-- not for the assumed element of fantasy therein, but for the bad rap he associates with attempts to secure legal avenues to political precedent.


Sunday, February 23, 2003

Russian oil.

Russian officials indicate that they do no intend to increase combat readiness in preparation for war with Iraq. Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov said, "We are doing everything possible to prevent the war with political and diplomatic methods and we will continue to do so."

Conflicts of interest should get interesting, as the Blair administration struggles to balance an antiwar popular majority with its committment to the Atlantic Alliance. In this regard, BP's recent agreement to form a partnership with Russian oil giant, Tyumen Oil Company, indicates a new market for oil R&D might soon accomodate the European markets. Obviously, Blair doesn't need to fight this war for oil? Which leads me to wonder-- what exactly is this poor man thinking?!


Saturday, February 22, 2003

How useful are ratings in predicting a stock's future performance?

Emory University Finance Professor Narasimhan Jegadeesh analyzed 55,000 took ratings from 1985 through 1998 and found that changes in the consensus Buy, Hold, or Sell rating are more useful in predicting future stock performance than the rating itself. Jegadeesh's study revealed that a ratings upgrade does have an immediate effect on a stock's shares, as stock prices rose an average of 2.34% over the three days following a ratings upgrade if the shift came after an earnings announcement. If the shift came before the earnings annoucement, then stock prices rose an average of 1.45% over the three days after the upgrade.

Analyst predictions tended to be the most accurate for beaten-down "value stocks" with low price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios. Jegadeesh comments:

"Analysts tend to rate glamour stocks more favourably.... When they go against that tendency and recommend an unpopular stock, they're more accurate."
So, take note of what your favorite analyst says about companies and stocks outside the mainstream bets. Chances are that information on a newly-emerging stock is due to the innovation or good business practices that propelled an unknown into the ranks of the tried-and-true. Information on the "glamour stocks" is abundant-- as the number of stockholders rises, the demand for information about its earnings etc. also increases. On the other hand, you don't get to party with the big boys by being just another measly proletariat. Sometimes it takes an incredibly creative business plan combined with low levels of risk averseness to catch the important eyes.


Friday, February 21, 2003

The cost of war.

A sizable price tag for this one-- $1 trillion.


Friday, February 21, 2003

Why this war will not be short and sweet.

According to Daily Times, Turkey is demanding that it be allowed to send 60,000 to 80,000 of its own troops into northern Iraq to establish “strategic positions” across a “security arc” as much as 140 to 170 miles deep in Iraq. Turkish sources report that these troops would not be under US command-- the technical loophole here is that Turkey only agreed to “coordination” between US and Turkish forces.

Ankara rightly fears the Iraqi Kurds might use Saddam’s fall to declare independence. The Kurds rejected the earlier notion of a narrow buffer zone, so a broad buffer zone will not increase their feelings of comraderie with US troops in the area.

Farhad Barzani, the US representative of the main Kurdish party in Iraq, the KDP, says, “We have told them: American troops will come as liberators. But Turkish troops will be seen as invaders.”
Let's put the pieces in perspective. Currently, the autonomous northern zone of Iraq is ruled by the two main Kurdish groups, the PUK and the KDP Iraq's six opposition American-approved opposition groups met in London at the end of last year to discuss postwar scenarios. They walked away with optimism, feeling that Bush supported their bids for regional autonomy and self-rule. However, a meeting in Turkey last week between three of the six groups and Zalmay Khalilzad, Bush's envoy, quickly cleared the air of any false hopes.

At this meeting, Khalilzad informed the attendees that, in the event of Mr. Hussein's fall, the US intends to install an American military governor for a year or so, and to place American military officials in the main ministries. Needless to say, Iraqi opposition groups have not take this news very well.


Thursday, February 20, 2003

One point for the French.

A French court acquitted Yahoo! and it's former boss, Tim Koogle, of crimes against humanity for allowing the sale of Nazi memorabilia on the internet firm's American auction website. This ruling could spell the end of a three-year legal battle that tested to what extent regional restrictions can curtail global Internet use.

How did this case against the man Businessweek called "the grown-up voice of reason at Yahoo!" wind up in criminal court anyway? In 2000, the International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism and the Union of French Jewish Students took Yahoo and Koogle to court in France, asking that the Internet company block French Internet users to bid on Nazi memorabilia that was being auctioned from a Web site it hosts. The groups took the Santa Clara, California, company to court citing a French law that makes it illegal to exhibit or sell items with racist undertones.

Then, in November 2000, the French court ordered Yahoo to block Internet users in France from auctions selling the memorabilia. In turn, Yahoo asked a California federal court for a summary judgement against the order and the judgment was granted. Shortly after the verdict, the French parties filed an appeal, arguing that the California court did not have jurisdiction in the case.

The name of the group who filed the complaint in October 2001 is the Association Amicale des Diportis D'Auschwitz. Writing for The Industry Standard, Kristi Essick notes the particular precedent-setting aspect of this case.

Unlike the prior civil case brought against Yahoo by the League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism, and the Jewish student group UEJF, this case will take place in a criminal court. Mr. Koogle faces prosecution in the Tribunal Correctional de Paris and could face fines or imprisonment if the plaintiffs win the case.
Yahoo!, meanwhile, bans the sale of most Third Reich mementoes. The Paris court's decision to throw out the accusations means a victory for Yahoo, which argued that 1) a global company cannot be held to regional laws and 2) that it was protected by the U.S.'s First Amendment right to free speech. Clearly, we must keep the criminal separate from the civil in international and national law, especially where internet law is concerned.

I would be surprised if the Association Amicale des Diportis D'Auschwitz doesn't appeal the verdict. Hopefully, this case will end up where it belongs-- in a civil court in California. For a sharp look at the international jurisdictional issues implicated in this case, see the Center for Democracy and Technology's comprehensive coverage.


Thursday, February 20, 2003

Ain't no Republicrat, no Demican, no nothin' in between.

A few quick articles on how the two major American political parties only seem to differ on their preference for traditional cocktail shrimp v. sushi. On spending matters, Republicans sound alot like Democrats. Norman Soloman doesn't hesistate to demonstrate the conspicuous mutual kow-towing of both parties on the question of the Iraq war. Maybe Matlin and Carville can finally work on a project together now that their respective parties are marching to the same tedious tune.


Thursday, February 20, 2003

If I were a Democrat, Dean would be my candidate of choice.

Salon's Jake Tapper goes on the campaign trail with Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who blasts fellow Democratic presidential candidates for trying to "me too" the "most dangerous presidency since Herbert Hoover."


Thursday, February 20, 2003

A crazy case + a crazy ruling = "justice" and other such Dickensian tripe.

According to The New York Post, an appeals court ruled yesterday that "threatening your lawyer with bodily harm doesn't entitle you to a new trial".

Patricio Linares claimed he was deprived of his right to a fair trial in a drug case when a judge refused to let him switch lawyers. Linares said he needed a new one because of a "conflict of interest following [his] threat to injure his attorney."

That argument didn't move the state Appellate Division to vacate his 1998 conviction, however. "In the first place, any such conflict was of [Linares'] own making," the five-judge panel found.

Secondly, the unidentified lawyer "stated that he could continue to represent [Linares] effectively despite the threats," the judges said.

Linares and his lawyer apparently had their falling out after the attorney recommended "he plead guilty and that he seek to cooperate with police."
While I agree with the court's ruling, Linares' case raises serious doubts about the already-dubitable committment of attorneys in defending their clients. Oh well, committment is so passe anyway-- one of those fossils from the last millenium.


Thursday, February 20, 2003

The New York Post's Dan Mangan reveals sadistic tendencies.

What better word than sadism-- taking pleasure, in this case, in the pain of still-rational Americans-- can decribe such a nasty revelation.

Sacre bleu! French President Jacques Chirac has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Chirac, a leading opponent of war with Iraq, was one of 150 nominees, including rock star Bono and Pope John Paul II, for the prestigious prize, said Geir Lundestad, the head of the Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo yesterday. The winner will be announced in October.
Give me back my pleasant delusions about the Nobel Peace Prize.


Thursday, February 20, 2003

On the diplomatic front.

William Pfaff accuses the Bush administration of ill-considered "macho posturing". Meanwhile, Bush's allies in the Saudi Arabian government declare an Arab Summit to be futile, as war is "imminent".

The Kingdom told the United Nations yesterday that the world is standing at the threshold of an “overwhelming disaster” that could be averted by having Iraq implement UN resolutions and major powers respecting Iraq’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. “The drums of war are getting louder, threats and warnings are deafening and the omens of terrifying conflagration and destruction are massing on the horizon,” the Kingdom’s UN Ambassador Fawzi Shobokshi told a resumed Security Council meeting on the situation in Iraq. Shobokshi urged that war in Iraq be limited because Baghdad has suffered two previous wars and a third one could destroy it.
Speaking for himself and the "American people", President Bush remains undaunted by last weekend's protests, refusing to allow protests to hold him back from protecting the security of Americans.
President Bush yesterday said the big worldwide anti-war protests show "democracy is a beautiful thing" but they won't stop him from attacking Iraq because his job is to protect America.

The White House also strongly defended the Eastern European states that are solidly backing Bush on Iraq by standing up to anti-war pressure from France, which has threatened to retaliate by blackballing them from joining the European Union.
Just another day in post-Cold War diplomacy.


Thursday, February 20, 2003

The ladies who only lunch sometimes.

Salon's David Talbot talks to Camille Paglia about her views on the war, the Columbia incident, and "foreboding". Peggy Noonan channels Auden and a little savoir vivre to discuss the anxiety of life in New York for one week.


Thursday, February 20, 2003

An inviggorating forward from a friend.

Wherever actor Viggo Mortensen goes, people ask him about the analogy between the U.S. fight against terrorism and the epic battle between good and evil in the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy. The comparison has received a lot of press particularly in the U.S. where some have even gone so far as to suggest Christopher Lee's character — the evil Lord Saruman — looks like Osama bin Laden (does that mean George W Bush is Gandalf?).

During a recent visit to Japan to promote "Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers," the second in the series, the 44-year-old Mortensen was ready for the question, sporting a T-shirt in Japanese that read "No more blood for oil." His co-star, New Zealand actor Karl Urban, who showed up with him, had peace symbols stitched all over his jacket.

"I have not done this sort of thing in connection with one of my movies before, but I don't like my work being misinterpreted," Mortensen said, speaking slowly, sometimes almost inaudibly. "Tolkien wrote the stories during World War II and he himself said then that it shouldn't be seen as a comparison to the war. It is no more allegorical now. It bothered me, so I wanted to say something.

"Since 9-11, more people have died in Afghanistan and Iraq than in New York that day — and for not a very good reason. Yet, you are looked down upon in the U.S. if you recommend dialogue before military action. Our country was founded on the principle of free speech and I say to go ahead with war without openly discussing it is morally wrong and dangerous."
I love it!


Thursday, February 20, 2003

"Civilization" by Eugen Demeterca.


Thursday, February 20, 2003

Breakthroughs in genetic research on autism.

Exciting news for those who suffer from autism, or have close family or friends likewise affected. It seems that Duke University Medical Center researchers have developed a new statistical genetic "fishing net" to harvest the elusive and highly controversial autism gene. According to a report from Duke MedNews, the researchers believe the success of the approach might be more broadly applied to studying genetic risk factors for other complex genetic diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes and multiple sclerosis.

In this case, the gene, which encodes part of a brain neurotransmitter docking station called the gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor beta3-subunit (GABRB3), has been implicated in autism previously, but never positively linked to the disease. Their findings will be published in the March 2003 issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics.

"Many research groups have been actively looking for genetic risk factors that can lead to autism, but without much success," said Margaret Pericak-Vance, Ph.D., director of the Duke Center for Human Genetics and lead investigator of the study.

Autism is the common term that encompasses an overlapping group of complex developmental disorders that are diagnosed in about one in 1,000 children under the age of 3. Each autistic child has a unique set of characteristics that affect his or her behavior, communication skills and ability to interact with others. It is the very diverse, complex nature of autism that has made it so difficult to locate distinct genetic risk factors, said Pericak-Vance.

After several genetic studies turned up only a few vague genetic clues, the research team decided a new approach was needed. Pericak-Vance hypothesized that grouping patients with similar traits together statistically might enhance the scientists' ability to distinguish relevant genetic risk factors. To provide guidance, the scientists turned to Michael Cuccaro, Ph.D., a clinical child psychologist at Duke with extensive experience diagnosing and treating autism. Cuccaro noticed that some but not all autistic children exhibit repetitive compulsions and extreme difficulty with changes to their daily routine. This character trait -- defined by Cuccaro as "insistence on sameness" or "IS" -- helped the research team identify a subset of autism family data to study in more detail.

Researchers, led by Yujun Shao, Ph.D., a genetic epidemiologist at Duke, reorganized data collected from families in which more than one child is affected by autism and grouped together all the families that reported their autistic child had difficulty with change.

Cuccaro's theory that autistic children could be subdivided into at least two groups gave the team of scientists from Duke and the University of South Carolina an opportunity to test a new statistical method, called "ordered subset analysis," developed by Elizabeth Hauser, Ph.D., assistant research professor of medicine at Duke. This new genetic fishing net allows scientists to sift through complex genetic data and extract genetic risk factors that affect only some of the total group.

In this case, when the researchers applied the new test only to those families whose children scored high in the IS category, they discovered a strong link to the GABRB3 gene on chromosome 15q, where no such link had appeared before.

"This is the first successful application of ordered subset analysis to help us pinpoint a genetic risk factor that would be missed by looking at the larger group." said Pericak-Vance. The researchers emphasize that this discovery is only the first step in understanding how the GABRB3 gene, or others genes in the same region of chromosome 15 might be involved in autism. Another clue may be gained from previous research that has shown the same area on chromosome 15 is just as responsible for Angelman Syndrome and Prader-Willi Syndrome -- two genetic disorders in which a subset of affected children also exhibit repetitive behavior. Additional research will be necessary to understand how defects in the GABRB3 gene might contribute to autistic disorder, and how other genes or environmental factors also play a role.


Thursday, February 20, 2003

What does the war mean for the Romanian street?

Romanian anti-war demonstrators put empty papers in a box reading 'Strong evidence' in front of a banner reading 'No - Not in my name' in central Bucharest on February 15, 2003 during a protest against a possible U.S.-led war on Iraq. This demonstration in Romania is part of massive rallies planned throughout different time zones worldwide, with the peace movement expected to spread to more than 600 towns and cities stretching from Tasmania in the south to Iceland in the north.

So what has the Romanian government and business community been doing to raise the ire of its citizens? For starters, the Romanian government decided to deploy 278 troops chiefly anti-chemical and anti-biological warfare units to near Iraq and opened the country's skies to US fighter jets in the event of a military campaign to disarm Iraq.

War brings business opportunities for post-communist states, long-accustomed to heavy industry. Many Romanian women have recently been hired to make quality inspections on Romanian manufactured gas masks in a factory in Buzau, 100 kilometers northeast of Bucharest. The company, Romcarbon, which was involved in the construction in 1988 of a factory producing protective equipment against gas and chemicals in Iraq is hoping that the current threat of war in the Gulf region will lead to a boost in its sales to military and civilian customers.


Wednesday, February 19, 2003

Make No Vows by Grace Fallows Norton.

For the man who explained "mutual aid" to me-- because there is more to lie than meets the eye, and more to passion than summed by the sigh.

I MADE a vow once, one only.
I was young and I was lonely.
When I grew strong I said: “This vow
Is too narrow for me now.
Who am I to be bound by old oaths?
I will change them as I change my clothes!”

But that ancient outworn vow
Was like fetters upon me now.
It was hard to break, hard to break;
Hard to shake from me, hard to shake.

I broke it by day, but it closed upon me at night.
He is not free who is free only in the sun-light.
He is not free who bears fetters in his dreams,
Nor he who laughs only by dark dream-fed streams.

Oh, it costs much bright coin of strength to live!
Watch, then, where all your strength you give!
For I, who would be so wild and wondrous now,
Must give, give, to break a burdening bitter vow.


Wednesday, February 19, 2003

America's "frat-boy-style" foreign policy.

Let there be no doubt in anyone's mind-- I am going to lambast the Bush administration's foul-play otherwise known as the liberation of Afghanistan. Nation-building has never been the forte of American international strategy. Given the short, 4-year attention span of politicians, most promises of reconstruction and aid have revealed themselves to be of the frat boy variety-- triumphantly spoken and quickly forgotten.

According to Shahabuddin Tarakhel reporting from Kabul, "Afghanistan’s Hindus and Sikhs, the country’s only significant non-Muslim minorities, say they continue to face prejudice and problems educating their children over a year after the collapse of the Islamic fundamentalist Taleban regime". Rahimullah Samander and Danish Karokhel reveal the problems faced by returning Ismailis:

Afghanistan's Ismaili community, which suffered mass killings under the Taleban regime, is now facing persecution under the country's new transitional democratic government.

The Ismailis, who broke from the mainstream Shi'a Muslims in the 8th century and have over the years settled in several countries and in pockets of Afghanistan, particularly the Kayan valley north-west of Kabul, have long been regarded with suspicion by other groups in this conservative Muslim country because of their unorthodox religious views and practices.

Unlike other Muslims, Ismailis, who worship in secret, do not believe that a past religious leader will return to the world at a later date. Instead, they have followed an unbroken line of leaders up to the present Karim Aga Khan, who is active in international humanitarian efforts.
In addition to the insecurity ethnic relations which continue to plague Afghanistan, thousands of Afghan women are suffering from mental illness resulting from the last 20 years of violent conflict in the area. Unfortunately, these women, unlike our dear, "stressed" American soccer-moms, will not find salvation in a little Prozac or Xanax or Johnny Walker Black Label. Apparently, opium use is on the rise among Afghani females.

The economic scene does not look much better. Difficulties in adjusting to the newly-issued currency has created a flood of forged banknotes, raising new concerns about the economic stability most productive to the institutionalization of multiethnic, pluralist democracy. And with the media's attention to the war on Iraq, Bush's promises will be worth less than the sum of his speech-writer's salary. Next promise from our frat-boys-cum-statesmen? "Democracy and liberation for the Iraqi people!" I've got five lives on it.


Wednesday, February 19, 2003

A case of premature repatriation.

Around 1.7 million refugees - four times the planned total - came home from Pakistan and Iran in 2002. Writing from Kabul, Colin McIntyre suggests that last year's UN-organized mass repatriation of almost 2 million Afghan refugees was "premature and has caused serious disruption to the country’s reconstruction process".

McIntyre's conclusions draw from a study conducted by the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) entitled, "Taking Refugees for a Ride?". In this study, the AREU claims the programme was driven by internal and external political pressures rather than the best interests of the displaced persons themselves. But the United Nations High Council for Refugess, UNHCR, has defended the repatriation programme. Quick fact check-- did the UNHCR ever argue in favor of repatriating the Kosovar and Albanian Muslims who made their way into Macedonia in the past six years?


Wednesday, February 19, 2003

The Radical on Roma rights.

The Radical pens a good sum of the situation facing Bosnian Roma. He notes that a 1991 census counted approximately 8,800 self-declared Roms in Bosnia-Herzegovina, although an article from the Institute for War and Peace Reporting suggests that the actual number may be 10 times as high.

According to the Roma activist, Alexandra Raykova, 60% of Bosnian Roma are illiterate, 90% lack health insurance and several do not even have citizenship. In addition, many Roma children cannot even attend school because other parents refuse to allow them to sit in the same classrooms as their children. There can be no doubt that the Roma are furthered encumbered by their statelessness. In fact, many Roma are not even mentioned on census counts for European countries.


Wednesday, February 19, 2003

A worker's syndicate strike in Romania, as photographed by Silviu Ghetie.


Wednesday, February 19, 2003

Loneliness by Rainer Maria Rilke, as translated by Robert Bly.

Being apart and lonely is like rain.
It climbs toward evening from the ocean plains;
from flat places, rolling and remote, it climbs
to heaven, which is its old abode.
And only when leaving heaven drops upon the city.

It rains down on us in those twittering
hours when the streets turn their faces to the dawn,
and when two bodies who have found nothing,
dissapointed and depressed, roll over;
and when two people who despise eachother
have to sleep together in one bed-

that is when loneliness recieves the rivers...


Wednesday, February 19, 2003

How effective are US ground troops since RMA?

The battle of Shah-i-Kot, fought in March 2002, was widely spun as a vindication of the effectiveness of US troops on the ground. Not so, says Michael Griffin: it showed them as an overwieldy and unprepared force when confronted by their Pashtun and Al Qa'ida enemy, veterans of countless mountain skirmishes. Other sources have led me to believe that RMA makes ground forces much less important to the current high-tech warfare.


Wednesday, February 19, 2003

Why are classes still getting bigger?

The Manhattan Institute's Education Research Office has shown that a 48% increase in the teacher workforce, adjusting for enrollment increases, has not led to a reduction in class sizes. A new article by Jay P. Greene and Greg Forster, writing for The National Review, attempts to explain how this counterintuitive development has occurred.




"GIVE BACK MY BOOK AND TAKE MY KISS INSTEAD.
WAS IT MY ENEMY OR MY FRIEND I HEARD,
"WHAT A BIG BOOK FOR SUCH A LITTLE HEAD!"
-Edna Saint Vincent Millay



SEARCH THIS WEBLOG
Search www


Alina Stefanescu
alinaon@aol.com

CASTIGAT RIDENDO MORES.

ARCHIVES

9/10-9/15, 9/15-9/21, 9/22, 9/23-9/24, 9/25-9/27, 9/28/02, 9/29, 9/30, 10/1, 10/2, 10/3-10/7, 10/8, 10/9-10/10, 10/11-10/14, 10/15-10/18, 10/20-10/23, 10/24-11/02, 11/03-11/05, 11/06-11/11, 11/12-11/17, 11/18-11/24, 11/25-12/3, 12/4-12/5, 12/6-12/7, 12/8-12/10, 12/11, 12/12, 12/13, 12/14-12/17, 12/18-12/20, 12/21-12/22, 12/23-12/25, 12/26-12-29, 12/30, 12/31-1/1, 1/2, 1/3-1/5, 1/6-1/8, 1/9-1/11, 1/12-1/17, 1/18-1/23, 1/24-1/28, 1/29-1/31, 2/1-2/5, 2/6-2/7, 2/8-2/10, 2/11
, 2/12-2/14, 2/15-2/17
, 2/18-2/19


CURRENTLY DEVOURING

LEGACY OF DISSENT: FORTY YEARS OF WRITING FROM DISSENT MAGAZINE edited by Nicolaus Mills

DRINKING WITH BUKOWSKI: RECOLLECTIONS OF THE POET LAUREATE ON SKID ROW edited by Daniel Weizman

ON LOVE: A NOVEL by Alain de Botton

THE CRITIQUE OF THE STATE by Jens Bartelson

GEORGE ORWELL: ESSAYS edited and introduced by John Carey


CURRENTLY LISTENING TO

Danse Macabre by The Faint

The House of Jealous Lovers by The Rapture


NEWS AND DISSENTING VIEWS

ABC News
Acton Institute
Against Bombing
Altercation
Alternet
American Prospect
Anti-state.com
Antiwar.com
Antiwarmonger
Asia Source
Baltic Times
Beltway Boys
Boston Globe
Boston Phoenix
Business Week
Center for Public Integrity
Chronicles
City Journal
C-SPAN
C-Log
Counterpunch
Dar Al-Hayat
Democracy Now
Drudge Report
Economist
Eisenhower Institute
Enterprise Economy
Exile
F.A.I.R.
Financial Times
Freezerbox
Free Networks
Friends Committee
Ha'aretz
Index on Censorship
Independent
In These Times
Insight
IHT
Joe Sobran
Ken Hamblin
Kuro5hin
L.A. Times
Laura Ingraham
Le Monde
Liberty Committee
Liberty
Nando Times
National Center for Policy Analysis
National Review
Newsweek
New York Times
Reason
Right-Wing News
Robert Fisk
Sharpeworld
Slate
Stars and Stripes
Strike the Root
Spiked
Sunday Herald
The Cato Institute
The Last Ditch
The Nation
Take Back the Media
The Tuscaloosa News
Village Voice
Wall Street Journal
Washington Times
Wired
Wiretap
World Press Review
Z-mag


SCHOLARLY TRACTS AND INTELLECTUAL PRETENSIONS

3AM Magazine
American Political Science Review
Arts and Letters
Atlantic Monthly
Blue Ear
Boston Review
Claremont Review of Books
Code Magazine
Commentary
Context
Dissent
Edge
Essays in History
Esoterica
Exquisite Corpses
First Things
FindArticles
Forward
Gore Vidal
Granta
Hudson Review
Identity Theory
Killing the Buddha
Logos
London Review of Books
Manhattan Institute
Mental Floss
Moving Ideas
National Public Radio
Nerve
Newtopia
New Criterion
New Left Review
New Statesman
New York Press
New York Review of Books
New York Times Magazine
New Yorker
Other Voices
Parabola
Partisan Review
Popcultures.com
Watchword
Wilson Quarterly
Salon
The Philosopher's Magazine
To the Quick




ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND THEORY

Atlas Economic Research Foundation
Behavioral Economics and Decision Resource Center
Business 2.0
Businessweek
David Friedman
Dismal Scientist
Foundation for Economic Education
Forbes
GameTheory.net
Game Theory Society
Hoover Institution
Hudson Institute
Independent Review
Institute for Economic Affairs
Institute for Economic Studies Europe
Institute for International Economics
Institutional Economics
International Journal of Game Theory
Jefferson School
Ludwig von Mises Institute
National Bureau of Economic Research
Peter J. Boettke
Policy Review
Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics


THE LAW

Center for National Security Law
Drept
East European Constitutional Review
Findlaw
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy
Harvard Law Review
Institute for the Study of Civil Society
International Journal of Consitutional Law
Judicial Watch
Tom Paine.com
University of Chicago Law Review


FOREIGN POLICY AND ALL THINGS INTERNATIONAL

Afghanistan Info
Albanian Media
American Academy of Diplomacy
American Foreign Policy Council
ASEAN
Atlantic Bridge
Brookings Institution
Brown Journal of World Affairs
Center for Defense Info
Central Europe Review
Center for International Policy
Chinese Military Power
CIA
CIA Studies
Common Ground Radio
Council on Foreign Relations
Dept. of Defense
Dept. of State International Information Programs
DIA
East European Politics and Societies
Economies in Conflict and Transition
Federation of American Scientists
FindArticles
Foreign Affairs
Fletcher Forum
Globalisation News
House Committee on International Relations
Independent Review
Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis
International Affairs Network
International Institute for Strategic Studies
International Monetary Fund
Irish Times
Islamic Voice
Japan Today
Jerusalem Post
Johnson's Russia List
Journal of Conflict Studies
Middle East Institute
Middle East News
Moscow Times
Monterey Institute of International Studies
NAFTA
NATO
National Endowment for Democracy
National Security Agency
OECD
OPEC
OSCE
Policy Review
QDR Page
RAND
Radio Free Europe & Radio Liberty
Reality Macedonia
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Social Philosophy Policy Center
Sovereignty International, Inc.
Sovereignty Projects and Governments in Exile
Transitions Online
Turkish Daily News
UN Center for Disarmament Affairs
UNHCR
UNICEF
UNMOVIC
Unrepresented Peoples and Nations Organization
U.S. Institute of Peace
Voice of America
Weatherhead Center for International Affairs
World Bank Group
World Trade Organization



ROMANIA

Bucharest Business Week
Ceausescu.org
Dada
Diplomatic Archives of Romania
Eugene Ionesco
Escape Artist
Invest Romania Business Daily
Nine O'Clock
Rador News
Romania Gateway
Romania Today
Romanian History Index
Romanian Press Review
Rompres
Ten Years After the Fall
Timisoara
Tristan Tsara
Washington Post Romania


THE PERSONAL IS POLITICAL.

Alabama Scholars Association
Anti/Love
Bureaucrash
Bitch
Breaking All the Rules
Build Freedom
Center for Equal Opportunity
Center for Libertarian Studies
Cooperative Individualism
Comfusion
Constitution Party
Disinformation
Drept
Erosblog
Fabiani Society
Farm Aid
Foundation for Equal Rights in Education
Freedomwriter
Harvard Federalist Society Blog
Ideas on Liberty
Kitchen Sink Magazine
Libertarian International
Murray Rothbard
National Association of Scholars
Objectivist Center
Slouching towards euphoria
Sovereign Society
Stand Down
War Resisters Group
The Freedom Network
The IHS
The Mises Institute
The Voluntaryist


TECH, MUSIC, GRAPHICS, A.K.A. MEDIA

Artist Direct
Everything2
Foreign Films.com
Martin Kennedy
Netflix
Nude As The News
Opi8.com
Redhat
Romp
Shoutcast
Slashdot
Soulseek
TechCentralStation


THOSE WHO INFLUENCE ME.

Ariel Dorfman
Aristotle
Auburn University Philosophy Dept.
David Hume
David Schmidtz
Emma Goldman
Erica Jong
G.K. Chesterton
Hannah Arendt
H.L. Mencken
Karl Popper
Lysander Spooner
Martha Nussbaum
Michel Foucault
Plotinus
Richard Rorty
Roderick Long
Stanley Cavell
Vaclav Havel
Vilfredo Pareto
Vladimir Tismaneanu
Wittgenstein

WORTH WATCHING

Aaron Biterman
BalticBlog
Beyond Corporate
Bill St. Clair
Bluestreak
Boston Blogs
Dean Allen
Gene Healy
Ghost in the Machine
Jameson and Christina
Jerry Brito
Joanne McNeil
Julian Sanchez
Kelly Jane Torrance
Lew Rockwell
Merde in France
Nolo Consentire
PostPolitics
Radley Balko
Ron Paul
Samizdata
Sisyphus Shrugged
Steven Garrity
Texts and Pretexts
The Radical
The Reach-M High Cowboy Network Noose
The Volokh Conspiracy
Tom Palmer
Unruled
William Sullivan


AND I MIGHT BE AT THE...

IHS Seminar on the war [7/4 thru 7/6]


MOVIES I ALWAYS CRAVE

A Beautiful Mind
Amores Perros
Amy's O
Braveheart
Bringing Up Baby
Cookie's Fortune
Damage
Death and the Maiden
Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
Everyone Says I Love You
Eyes Wide Shut
Filantropica
Heathers
Hedwig and the Angry Inch
Like Water for Chocolate
Love and Anarchy
Persona
Shadowlands
Shortcuts
The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie
The House of Yes
The Oak
The Rules of the Game
The Unbearable Lightness of Being
Train of Life
Under Suspicion
Wings of Desire



Site
Meter