|
TOTALITARIANISM TODAY
Wednesday, February 19, 2003
XX. Intel threat assessment.
Director of Central Intelligence's Worldwide Threat Briefing for 2003, which cites bin Laden and al Quaeda as the primary threats to American security. The same claims are made in Vice Admiral Lowell E. Jacoby's Feb. 11th, 2003 speech for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Jacoby is Director of the USN-- a senior official in the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Wednesday, February 19, 2003
XIX. Get your angst on.
A new novel takes snide shots at Poland's underachievers in the global age.
Dorota Maslowska's Polish-Russian War Under the White-Red Flag "consists of an interior monologue by Andrzej Robakowski, a.k.a. Silny (which means 'strong')". Like any proper tale of angst, his girlfriend has just dumped him, his drug problems are no longer interesting, and his "worldview" just isn't as cool as he might prefer.
Silny describes himself as an anarcho-leftist, and then shares his vision of leadership, in which his party would rule over Poland. At party headquarters in Silny’s Poland, you would be able to get amphetamines from vending machines and sex from the secretaries. All very revolutionary, of course, but the pension problems always seem to put a dent in wet-dreams of revolution. Here is an excerpt of Maslowska's latest:
When I woke up by the sea, the fact that I got a biro is pretty much all I can remember. On the biro are the words: Zdzislaw Sztorm, Sand Production, March 12th Street something. I imagine this sand, how it is produced by modern technologies, modernly packed into a bag, modernly distributed. I can remember my thoughts of a truly economical character that could have saved the country from doom, like I already told you, from the doom prepared by fucking aristocrats in trenchcoats, who, if only they got the opportunity, would sell us, citizens, to the West, to brothels, to the Bundeswehr for organs, as slaves. The only solution is to expel them from their houses, expel them from their blocks of flats so as to make our homeland a typically agricultural homeland producing ordinary Polish sand for export so it will have a chance on global markets all over Europe.
How to characterize Sliny? Well, if he lived in America, he might be heavily involved in gang culture-- a cultural institution which developed from the fertile ground of teens who felt disenfranchised and threatened in a modern democratic state which promised them the status quo ante. Wojciech Kosc comments:
Silny is the quintessential street character that many Poles treat both with an air of superiority and fear: He is one of the dresiarze, young men whose career goals tend toward gang membership and who can be identified by the trainers and track suits (dresy) they wear. According to a recent article in the weekly Polityka, dresiarze are fast becoming the driving force behind organized crime in Poland.
I haven't read this book yet, but someday soon you guys will see it creep onto my "Currently devouring" list.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
XVIII. Courtesy of a mad pianist.
Chirac said his country might punish the Eastern Europeans for their pro-American stand by blocking their membership in the European Union. He singled out a pair of countries that are still negotiating to enter the EU in 2007: "Romania and Bulgaria were particularly irresponsible," CNN quotes him as saying. "If they wanted to diminish their chances of joining Europe they could not have found a better way."
Note that Chirac had nothing similar to say about America's numerous Western European allies. He evidently feels obliged to treat them with respect while bullying their more vulnerable neighbors. His outburst underscores the reason why Eastern Europeans are so pro-American. Having tasted freedom for the first time less than 15 years ago, they have plenty of experience being dictated to by a stronger power, and they count on America to preserve their hard-won independence.
In an interview with Time magazine, Chirac offers this brilliant strategy for dealing with the Iraqi threat: "If Saddam Hussein would only vanish, it would without a doubt be the biggest favor he could do for his people and for the world. But we think this goal can be reached without starting a war."
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
XVII. I knew it! Those dirty rotten scoundrels!
How annoying has it been that CD prices have not been driven down in the past decade by increased competition? Blame it on patents, collusion, the overall nastiness of the music industry, Saddam, whatever-- now is your chance to cut your losses. If you purchased any compact discs between 1995 and 2000 (i.e. if you have a pulse), the recording industry might owe you a nice check for $20.
Last September, the top five music distributors agreed to pay $143 million to settle a price-fixing lawsuit. The deadline to file your claim is March 3rd. Don't waste any time. And don't cash the check-- frame it as a reminder of why KaZaa has done so well.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
XVI. Reverbrations in stocks and strings.
According to Business 2.0, two theoretical physicists at Hebrew University, Lev Muchnik and Sorin Solomon, observed that graphical representations of stock-trading patters often resemble the sonogram of a plucked guitar string. During a panic, traders exaggerate the distance between the current price and the "right" price, thus creating wild oscillations which are naturally dampened by the market's resistance to excessive trading.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
XV. I Shall Not Care by Sarah Teasdale.
WHEN I am dead and over me bright April
Shakes out her rain-drenched hair,
Though you should lean above me broken-hearted,
I shall not care.
I shall have peace as leafy trees are peaceful,
When rain bends down the bough,
And I shall be more silent and cold-hearted
Than you are now.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
XIV. The post-privacy age.
Dan Savage instructs his readers on how to tell if you're a slut. Also, Saddam's ex-bodyguard warns of secret weapons. "Secret"? Impossible. The sacred and the secret have never been more profane.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
XIII. Tsk tsk.
Yesterday marks the date that
Renaissance occultist & radical, Giordano Bruno, was burned at the stake by the Catholic
Church in its beneficent wisdom.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
XII. Gaudi's liberating inspiration.

This is a photo of "La Sagrada Familia" by the infamous architect, Antoni Gaudi, whose most incredible works stand in Barcelona. I have promised myself that Barcelona will be my next vacation-- trading Gaudi's defiance for mine might help shrink this oft-overwhelming self-absorption.
Some of Gaudi's unrealized projects, including the "American hotel" pictured below, have been suggested to replace the World Trade Center.
 Granted, Gaudi's work testifies to the human capacity to overcome conceptual constraints and adapt to various environments-- during his lifetime, Gaudi was mocked by critics who believed his rejection of straight lines and his embrace of asymetry would lead all his buildings to collapse. The parallel for the Wahhabist critique of American liberty is interesting. However, as the Bush administration reduces this liberty to museum relic, the construction of a nice Romanesque coliseum might be more appropriate.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
XI. What's in a name?
I took the quiz to find out. The results? Your Heart Number is 7
Makes you a bit of a loner. You probably require a lot of time by yourself just to clear your head and recharge your batteries. You may be somewhat more concerned with the deeper issues of life.
Your Personality Number is 8
Makes you appear to be a rather intense individual, and you're probably not afraid to go after what you want. You like to be in control and other people may often approach you for advice.
Your Image Number is 6
And you probably appear to be a fairly responsible and hard-working individual who can always be counted on to be there when needed. You thrive on routine and enjoy the security that a stable home and family life can provide.
I'll leave it to you to tell me if you agree or disagree.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
X. A new horror.
Can there be such a thing as the guilt-free soldier? According to Eric Baard, the possibility is now probablity.
At the University of California at Irvine, experiments in rats indicate that the brain's hormonal reactions to fear can be inhibited, softening the formation of memories and the emotions they evoke. At New York University, researchers are mastering the means of short-circuiting the very wiring of primal fear. At Columbia University one Nobel laureate's lab has discovered the gene behind a fear-inhibiting protein, uncovering a vision of "fight or flight" at the molecular level. In Puerto Rico, at the Ponce School of Medicine, scientists are discovering ways to help the brain unlearn fear and inhibitions by stimulating it with magnets. And at Harvard University, survivors of car accidents are already swallowing propranolol pills, in the first human trials of that common cardiac drug as a means to nip the effects of trauma in the bud.
What a perfect tool for governments wishing to eradicate that pesky thing called conscience in soldiers! Not that conscience has prevented some of the most disgusting behaviors in history, but imagine if conscience could be eradicated in the face of "national security" needs.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
IX. What the comrades are saying.
Daniel J. Boone's tableux on the Columbia disaster is lovely. Disinformation draws attention to a little-known lawsuit challenging Bush's war with Iraq.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
VIII. Pacepa dares the ultimate irony-- An Ad hominem attack.
One of my favorite commentators on events in Europe, The Radical, narrows in on Romania's vulnerability vis-a-vis European allies given its extreme pro-America stance. Also, an interesting look at Pacepa's recent article for The National Review.
Pacepa, long a controversial figure in Romanian postcommunist studies, is working on a new book entitled Red Roots: The Origins of Today's Anti-Americanism. The skeptic in me finds Pacepa's about-face intolerable and self-promoting, while the scholar in me is fascinated by his inside information on Ceausescu's sick, paranoid regime. The fact that Pacepa's NR article takes Joschka Fischer to task for his youthful activities is absurdity taken to an extreme. Would Pacepa prefer to be considered in light of his Ceausescu-worshipping days? Does he need to reminded about the hundreds of innocent Romanians who he ordered to the Gulag? Pacepa concludes his self-righteous attack with the following:
It may never be possible to prove "beyond the shadow of a doubt" Joschka Fischer's connection with the Soviet KGB, but I do know that the KGB — and my DIE — was financing West Germany's anti-American terrorist movements in the 1970s, while I was still in Romania. Fischer's evidently ingrained anti-Americanism is now spreading throughout the German government, and beyond. This is a monumental display of ingratitude to the 405,399 American soldiers who gave their lives to defeat Berlin's old Axis, as well as to the millions of American taxpayers who spent trillions of dollars to rebuild Germany's war-torn economy and to protect West Germany from falling into Communist clutches.
And I remain stunned-- stunned that The National Review would publish such an intellctually sordid and irresponsible article; and stunned that Pacepa dares rear his plastic-surgey-enhanced-head to criticize a European official for his past.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
VII. Protest afterglow.
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw admits the antiwar protests have complicated efforts to launch a potentially devastating new Gulf war. Howard LaFranchi, writing for The Christian Science Monitor, notes two conflicting pressures at work since the protests. First,there is the pressure to delay the war and win more public support. Second, there is the pressure created by the massive buildup of troops and threat credibility which encourage Bush to act now or lose credibility with both troops and Saddam.
"You don't want to lose momentum, or allow the forces working against you to gain any more ground, so while [the Bush administration] may be ready to string this out a bit longer, I don't see them giving much ground," says Richard Murphy, a former diplomat now at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.
What I am trying to say? Well, ladies and gents, it is worth it.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
VI. Edward Said: The opposition scapegoat.
Edward Said has long been the bogeyman of conservatives who prefer a Huntingtonian explanation for international conflict. In an interview for The Atlantic Monthly, Said gives his reasons for opposing the Oslo Accords:
I was one of the first people in the Palestinian world, in the late 1970s, to say that there is no military option, either for us or for them, and I'm certainly the only well-known Arab who writes these things -- and who writes exactly the same things in the Arab press that I say here.
I'm trying to say that I know the politics of the PLO better than anyone, certainly in this country. I realized that the Oslo Accords were a result not only of Palestinian weakness, but also of Palestinian incompetence and miscalculation of a catastrophic sort. I said from the beginning that given the fact that Arafat had stood with Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War -- which was a crime against his people (Kuwait and Saudi Arabia kicked 3,000 or 4,000 Palestinians out of the Gulf in revenge for Arafat's act) -- he entered the secret talks at Oslo basically to save himself. And he entered the process without competent advice. Not one of the three people who were closeted in Oslo knew English, not one of them had a legal background. They would call people up in the middle of the night and say, What does the word "self-rule" mean, what does the word "autonomy" mean? They didn't even have maps, didn't even have a map of Palestine. Most of these people had never been there. The people negotiating Bethlehem, for example, had never seen Bethlehem. And on and on and on.
They took the thing back to Arafat and showed it to him. And the man who signed the accord on the White House lawn, Abu Mas'n, said that it took Arafat a year to understand that he didn't get a Palestinian state. That's what he thought he got, because he read only the paragraphs that had something to do with his status.
Okay, let's assume that all that is inevitable, that there was nothing else he could do. Still, why not level with your people, and tell them: This is all there is. This is all we can get now. We need your help. Let us all get behind this process and do what we can. And if you don't like this, I'll resign, but this is the most I can do. He never did that. Instead, he lied. He said we have gotten sovereignty, we've gotten a state. We've gotten nothing.
Nothing's said about the settlements, nothing's said about the refugees, nothing's said about Jerusalem. To call this an economic and political arrangement like that of a repressive Arab state is an understatement. And this is with the encouragement of the U.S. and the Israelis. They say openly that it's better for Palestinians to have a little tyrannical dictatorship, without sovereignty, without borders, without economic independence ...
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
V. My Achilles heel: A hyperactive sense of empathy.
William Powers thinks American journalists don't just report tragedy anymore. Instead, he accuses the press and its consumers of "wallowing" in it. I've heard various opinions that wallowing in one's pain is the best way to see through it. That said, is an imported pain best dealth with through wallowing? Are we straining our pity glands when we try to feel everything for everyone in the world?
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
IV. The battle is on.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
III. A clone to build a dream on.
Michel Houellebecq wants to talk about clones. And talk he does. Even if your opinions find no affection for his, the piece is still worth reading for his particular writing style.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
II. An Atlantic Monthly anthology on love.
Ethel S. Person writes about the differences in male and female behavior, caused by biological and psychological reasons as opposed to just cultural ones. On Person's view,
Because they are socialized in different ways, men and women tend to have different passionate quests—the passionate quest being that which constitutes the central psychological theme of a person's life. This passionate quest supplies the context for one's pursuit of self-realization, adventure, excitement, and, ultimately, transformation and even transcendence. The passionate quest is always a romance in the larger meaning of the word, but it is not always a quest for romantic love per se.
For women the passionate quest has usually been interpersonal, and has generally involved romantic love; for men it has more often been heroic, the pursuit of achievement or power. One might say that men tend to favor power over love and that women tend to achieve power through love. Socialization seems to be one of the factors that create the different dreams through which each sex shapes its narrative life.
Yet Person does not oversimplify the ways in which these opposing visions might be complementary to particular gender role assignment and role rigidity in modern society. In fact, she puts her finger on the contradictions implied by the very courting rituals and games that men and women play in order to seduce or attract one another.
Radway describes the typical heroine as feisty, independent, and spirited—this, paradoxically, despite her ultimate goal of surrendering her autonomy to the powerful hero, of losing herself in a romantic union. The man who is sought is distinguished by his extremely masculine characteristics (a stallion of a man, like Rhett Butler in Gone With the Wind); this preference is striking because it seems almost to preclude fulfillment of those desires for tender nurturance that are part of the central longings in love. In fact the natures of these two archetypes—fiery, independent heroine and powerful, aloof, even frightening hero—point to the same need: to separate the conscious experience of romantic love from its infantile origins. Apparently, for any of us, female or male, to identify with a romantic story, we must be reassured that the nurturance sought is of a different order from that offered by maternal love.
Approaching love from the perspective of modern marriage, Nora Johnson makes an excellent case against institutionalized self-destruction. When Johnson penned this article in 1962, the situation was somewhat simpler-- women were getting married instead of choosing careers. Now, with the rise of the working family, women usually have no choice except to work, save a few conservative women who make their desire to stay home clear. So we don't need men for money; and we don't need men for emotional support-- God and all of his angels know that the men most likely to give you emotional support are the ones with whom you are not sleeping. Infidelity is practically de rigeur, along with the sports car and the boat. Sporting equipment of various shapes and sizes has reached new heights in the hierarchy of status symbols-- a man just ain't a man if he doesn't have a squash racket to go with that tennis racket. Of course, squash and tennis are equal opportunity sports; it's just that most city councils don't seem to agree, which explains the remarkable lack of tennis or squash courts in the projects.
So what roles should men and women play in each other's lives now? What happens when we lose the script, or decide we don't like the ending? Better yet, why aren't people more excited about the end of the "performance"? I can only answer these questions for myself. In my experience, some men are wonderful, considerate, thoughtful-- basically, they have learned from feminism to treat women as their equals without punishing them for this equality. Other men are not so wonderful-- they are unwilling to consider a female as a "partner", resent being forced to consider their feelings as valid, and prefer the security provided by unequal relationships between the sexes. And, most men, of course, fall in neither category.
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
I. Excerpt from Ralph Waldo's Emerson's speech, "An American Scholar".
They are such as become Man Thinking. They may all be comprised in self-trust. The office of the scholar is to cheer, to raise, and to guide men by showing them facts amidst appearances. He plies the slow, unhonored, and unpaid task of observation. Flamsteed and Herschel, in their glazed observatories, may catalogue the stars with the praise of all men, and, the results being splendid and useful, honor is sure. But he, in his private observatory, cataloguing obscure and nebulous stars of the human mind, which as yet no man has thought of as such,—watching days and months, sometimes, for a few facts; correcting still his old records,—must relinquish display and immediate fame. In the long period of his preparation he must betray often an ignorance and shiftlessness in popular arts, incurring the disdain of the able, who shoulder him aside. Long he must stammer in his speech; often forego the living for the dead. Worse yet, he must accept—how often!—poverty and solitude. For the ease and pleasure of treading the old road, accepting the fashions, the education, the religion of society, he takes the cross of making his own, and, of course, the self-accusation, the faint heart, the frequent uncertainty and loss of time, which are the nettles and tangling vines in the way of the self-relying and self-directed; and the state of virtual hostility in which he seems to stand to society, and especially to educated society. For all this loss and scorn, what off-set? He is to find consolation in exercising the highest functions of human nature. He is one who raises himself from private considerations, and breathes and lives on public and illustrious thoughts. He is the world’s eye. He is the world’s heart. He is to resist the vulgar prosperity that retrogrades ever to barbarism, by preserving and communicating heroic sentiments, noble biographies, melodious verse, and the conclusions of history. Whatsoever oracles the human heart, in all emergencies, in all solemn hours, has uttered as its commentary on the world of actions,—these he shall receive and impart. And whatsoever new verdict Reason from her inviolable seat pronounces on the passing men and events of to-day,—this he shall hear and promulgate.
These being his functions, it becomes him to feel all confidence in himself, and to defer never to the popular cry. He and he only knows the world. The world of any moment is the merest appearance. Some great decorum, some fetish of a government, some ephemeral trade, or war, or man, is cried up by half mankind and cried down by the other half, as if all depended on this particular up or down. The odds are that the whole question is not worth the poorest thought which the scholar has lost in listening to the controversy. Let him not quit his belief that a popgun is a popgun, though the ancient and honorable of the earth affirm it to be the crack of doom. In silence, in steadiness, in severe abstraction, let him hold by himself; add observation to observation, patient of neglect, patient of reproach; and bide his own time,—happy enough if he can satisfy himself alone, that this day he has seen something truly. Success treads on every right step. For the instinct is sure that prompts him to tell his brother what he thinks. He then learns that in going down into the secrets of his own mind he has descended into the secrets of all minds. He learns that he who has mastered any law in his private thoughts is master to that extent of all men whose language he speaks, and of all into whose language his own can be translated. The poet, in utter solitude remembering his spontaneous thoughts and recording them, is found to have recorded that which men in crowded cities find true for them also. The orator distrusts at first the fitness of his frank confessions,—his want of knowledge of the persons he addresses,—until he finds that he is the complement of his hearers; that they drink his words because he fulfils for them their own nature; the deeper he dives into his privatest, secretest presentiment, to his wonder he finds this is the most acceptable, most public, and universally true. The people delight in it; the better part of every man feels, This is my music; this is myself. 32
In self-trust all the virtues are comprehended. Free should the scholar be,—free and brave. Free even to the definition of freedom, “without any hindrance that does not arise out of his own constitution.” Brave; for fear is a thing which a scholar by his very function puts behind him. Fear always springs from ignorance. It is a shame to him if his tranquility, amid dangerous times, arise from the presumption that, like children and women, his is a protected class; or if he seek a temporary peace by the diversion of his thoughts from politics or vexed questions, hiding his head like an ostrich in the flowering bushes, peeping into microscopes, and turning rhymes, as a boy whistles to keep his courage up. So is the danger a danger still; so is the fear worse. Manlike let him turn and face it. Let him look into its eye and search its nature, inspect its origin,—see the whelping of this lion, which lies no great way back; he will then find in himself a perfect comprehension of its nature and extent; he will have made his hands meet on the other side, and can henceforth defy it, and pass on superior. The world is his, who can see through its pretension. What deafness, what stone-blind custom, what overgrown error you behold, is there only by sufferance,—by your sufferance. See it to be a lie, and you have already dealt it its mortal blow.

"GIVE BACK MY BOOK AND TAKE MY KISS INSTEAD.
WAS IT MY ENEMY OR MY FRIEND I HEARD,
"WHAT A BIG BOOK FOR SUCH A LITTLE HEAD!"
-Edna Saint Vincent Millay
|
Alina Stefanescu
alinaon@aol.com
CASTIGAT RIDENDO MORES.
ARCHIVES
9/10-9/15, 9/15-9/21, 9/22, 9/23-9/24, 9/25-9/27, 9/28/02, 9/29, 9/30, 10/1, 10/2, 10/3-10/7, 10/8, 10/9-10/10, 10/11-10/14, 10/15-10/18, 10/20-10/23, 10/24-11/02, 11/03-11/05, 11/06-11/11, 11/12-11/17, 11/18-11/24, 11/25-12/3, 12/4-12/5, 12/6-12/7, 12/8-12/10, 12/11, 12/12, 12/13, 12/14-12/17, 12/18-12/20, 12/21-12/22, 12/23-12/25, 12/26-12-29, 12/30, 12/31-1/1, 1/2, 1/3-1/5, 1/6-1/8, 1/9-1/11, 1/12-1/17, 1/18-1/23, 1/24-1/28, 1/29-1/31, 2/1-2/5, 2/6-2/7, 2/8-2/10, 2/11 2/12-2/14, 2/15-2/17
CURRENTLY DEVOURING
LEGACY OF DISSENT: FORTY YEARS OF WRITING FROM DISSENT MAGAZINE edited by Nicolaus Mills
DRINKING WITH BUKOWSKI: RECOLLECTIONS OF THE POET LAUREATE ON SKID ROW edited by Daniel Weizman
ON LOVE: A NOVEL by Alain de Botton
THE CRITIQUE OF THE STATE by Jens Bartelson
GEORGE ORWELL: ESSAYS edited and introduced by John Carey
CURRENTLY LISTENING TO
Danse Macabre by The Faint
The House of Jealous Lovers by The Rapture
NEWS AND DISSENTING VIEWS
ABC News
Acton Institute
Against Bombing
Altercation
Alternet
American Prospect
Anti-state.com
Antiwar.com
Antiwarmonger
Asia Source
Baltic Times
Beltway Boys
Boston Globe
Boston Phoenix
Business Week
Center for Public Integrity
Chronicles
City Journal
C-SPAN
C-Log
Counterpunch
Dar Al-Hayat
Democracy Now
Drudge Report
Economist
Eisenhower Institute
Enterprise Economy
Exile
F.A.I.R.
Financial Times
Freezerbox
Free Networks
Friends Committee
Ha'aretz
Index on Censorship
Independent
In These Times
Insight
IHT
Joe Sobran
Ken Hamblin
Kuro5hin
L.A. Times
Laura Ingraham
Le Monde
Liberty Committee
Liberty
Nando Times
National Center for Policy Analysis
National Review
Newsweek
New York Times
Reason
Right-Wing News
Robert Fisk
Sharpeworld
Slate
Stars and Stripes
Strike the Root
Spiked
Sunday Herald
The Cato Institute
The Last Ditch
The Nation
Take Back the Media
The Tuscaloosa News
Village Voice
Wall Street Journal
Washington Times
Wired
Wiretap
World Press Review
Z-mag
SCHOLARLY TRACTS AND INTELLECTUAL PRETENSIONS
3AM Magazine
American Political Science Review
Arts and Letters
Atlantic Monthly
Blue Ear
Boston Review
Claremont Review of Books
Code Magazine
Commentary
Context
Dissent
Edge
Essays in History
Esoterica
Exquisite Corpses
First Things
FindArticles
Forward
Gore Vidal
Granta
Hudson Review
Identity Theory
Killing the Buddha
Logos
London Review of Books
Manhattan Institute
Mental Floss
Moving Ideas
National Public Radio
Nerve
Newtopia
New Criterion
New Left Review
New Statesman
New York Press
New York Review of Books
New York Times Magazine
New Yorker
Other Voices
Parabola
Partisan Review
Popcultures.com
Watchword
Wilson Quarterly
Salon
The Philosopher's Magazine
To the Quick
ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND THEORY
Atlas Economic Research Foundation
Behavioral Economics and Decision Resource Center
Business 2.0
Businessweek
David Friedman
Dismal Scientist
Foundation for Economic Education
Forbes
GameTheory.net
Game Theory Society
Hoover Institution
Hudson Institute
Independent Review
Institute for Economic Affairs
Institute for Economic Studies Europe
Institute for International Economics
Institutional Economics
International Journal of Game Theory
Jefferson School
Ludwig von Mises Institute
National Bureau of Economic Research
Peter J. Boettke
Policy Review
Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics
THE LAW
Center for National Security Law
Drept
East European Constitutional Review
Findlaw
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy
Harvard Law Review
Institute for the Study of Civil Society
International Journal of Consitutional Law
Judicial Watch
Tom Paine.com
University of Chicago Law Review
FOREIGN POLICY AND ALL THINGS INTERNATIONAL
Afghanistan Info
Albanian Media
American Academy of Diplomacy
American Foreign Policy Council
ASEAN
Atlantic Bridge
Brookings Institution
Brown Journal of World Affairs
Center for Defense Info
Central Europe Review
Center for International Policy
Chinese Military Power
CIA
CIA Studies
Common Ground Radio
Council on Foreign Relations
Dept. of Defense
Dept. of State International Information Programs
DIA
East European Politics and Societies
Economies in Conflict and Transition
Federation of American Scientists
FindArticles
Foreign Affairs
Fletcher Forum
Globalisation News
House Committee on International Relations
Independent Review
Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis
International Affairs Network
International Institute for Strategic Studies
International Monetary Fund
Irish Times
Islamic Voice
Japan Today
Jerusalem Post
Johnson's Russia List
Journal of Conflict Studies
Middle East Institute
Middle East News
Moscow Times
Monterey Institute of International Studies
NAFTA
NATO
National Endowment for Democracy
National Security Agency
OECD
OPEC
OSCE
Policy Review
QDR Page
RAND
Radio Free Europe & Radio Liberty
Reality Macedonia
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Social Philosophy Policy Center
Sovereignty International, Inc.
Sovereignty Projects and Governments in Exile
Transitions Online
Turkish Daily News
UN Center for Disarmament Affairs
UNHCR
UNICEF
UNMOVIC
Unrepresented Peoples and Nations Organization
U.S. Institute of Peace
Voice of America
Weatherhead Center for International Affairs
World Bank Group
World Trade Organization
ROMANIA
Bucharest Business Week
Ceausescu.org
Dada
Diplomatic Archives of Romania
Eugene Ionesco
Escape Artist
Invest Romania Business Daily
Nine O'Clock
Rador News
Romania Gateway
Romania Today
Romanian History Index
Romanian Press Review
Rompres
Ten Years After the Fall
Timisoara
Tristan Tsara
Washington Post Romania

THE PERSONAL IS POLITICAL.
Alabama Scholars Association
Anti/Love
Bureaucrash
Bitch
Breaking All the Rules
Build Freedom
Center for Equal Opportunity
Center for Libertarian Studies
Cooperative Individualism
Comfusion
Constitution Party
Disinformation
Drept
Erosblog
Fabiani Society
Farm Aid
Foundation for Equal Rights in Education
Freedomwriter
Harvard Federalist Society Blog
Ideas on Liberty
Kitchen Sink Magazine
Libertarian International
Murray Rothbard
National Association of Scholars
Objectivist Center
Slouching towards euphoria
Sovereign Society
Stand Down
War Resisters Group
The Freedom Network
The IHS
The Mises Institute
The Voluntaryist
TECH, MUSIC, GRAPHICS, A.K.A. MEDIA
Artist Direct
Everything2
Foreign Films.com
Martin Kennedy
Netflix
Nude As The News
Opi8.com
Redhat
Romp
Shoutcast
Slashdot
Soulseek
TechCentralStation
THOSE WHO INFLUENCE ME.
Ariel Dorfman
Aristotle
Auburn University Philosophy Dept.
David Hume
David Schmidtz
Emma Goldman
Erica Jong
G.K. Chesterton
Hannah Arendt
H.L. Mencken
Karl Popper
Lysander Spooner
Martha Nussbaum
Michel Foucault
Plotinus
Richard Rorty
Roderick Long
Stanley Cavell
Vaclav Havel
Vilfredo Pareto
Vladimir Tismaneanu
Wittgenstein
WORTH WATCHING
Aaron Biterman
BalticBlog
Beyond Corporate
Bill St. Clair
Bluestreak
Boston Blogs
Dean Allen
Gene Healy
Ghost in the Machine
Jameson and Christina
Jerry Brito
Joanne McNeil
Julian Sanchez
Kelly Jane Torrance
Lew Rockwell
Merde in France
Nolo Consentire
PostPolitics
Radley Balko
Ron Paul
Samizdata
Sisyphus Shrugged
Steven Garrity
Texts and Pretexts
The Radical
The Reach-M High Cowboy Network Noose
The Volokh Conspiracy
Tom Palmer
Unruled
William Sullivan
AND I MIGHT BE AT THE...
Vigil against war on Iraq, Veteran's Memorial in Tuscaloosa [2/18 from 5-6 PM]
IHS Seminar on the war [7/4 thru 7/6]
MOVIES I ALWAYS CRAVE
A Beautiful Mind
Amores Perros
Amy's O
Braveheart
Bringing Up Baby
Cookie's Fortune
Damage
Death and the Maiden
Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
Everyone Says I Love You
Eyes Wide Shut
Filantropica
Heathers
Hedwig and the Angry Inch
Like Water for Chocolate
Love and Anarchy
Persona
Shadowlands
Shortcuts
The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie
The House of Yes
The Oak
The Rules of the Game
The Unbearable Lightness of Being
Train of Life
Under Suspicion
Wings of Desire
|